 |
 |
Georgia State University Student Evaluations
Extremely Effective/Worthwhile |
|
Moderately Effective/Worthwhile |
|
Not at all Effective/Worthwhile |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Term |
Course Taught* |
Instructor Overall |
Course Overall |
|
Fall, 2006 |
CIS 9280 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
|
MGS 9940 |
4.6 |
4.0 |
|
Spring, 2006 |
BUSA 3000 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
|
Fall, 2005 |
MGS 9940 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
Fall, 2004 |
MGS 9940 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
|
|
CIS 9280 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
Fall, 2003 |
DSC 8820 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
|
Fall, 2002 |
CIS 9280 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
|
Summer, 2002 |
GEM 8800 |
4.6 |
4.8 |
|
Spring, 2002 |
MBA 8473 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
|
Fall, 2001 |
DSC 8820 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
Spring, 2001 |
GEM 8800 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
|
Fall, 2000 |
CIS 9280 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
Fall, 1999 |
CIS 8660 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
|
Spring, 1999 |
MBA 8473 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
Fall 1998 |
CIS 9280 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
|
Summer 1998 |
CIS 8150 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
|
Spring 1998 |
CIS 8680 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
|
Fall, 1997 |
CIS 815 |
4.7 |
4.2 |
|
Winter, 1997 |
CIS 815 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
|
|
IB 871 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
|
Fall 1996 |
CIS 928 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
Spring 1996 |
CIS 815 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
|
Winter 1996 |
CIS 815 |
4.2 |
3.7 |
|
|
CIS 868 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
|
|
IB 871 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
Fall, 1995 |
CIS 815 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
Winter, 1995 |
BA 867 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
|
Fall, 1994 |
CIS 918 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
|
CIS 321 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
|
|
CIS 321 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
|
Summer, 1994 |
CIS 321 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
|
Spring, 1994 |
BA 867 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
|
CIS 321 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
|
Winter, 1994 |
BA 867 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
|
Fall, 1993 |
CIS 928 |
5.0 |
4.8 |
|
|
BA 867 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
|
Spring, 1993 |
BA 867 |
4.7 |
3.7 |
|
Winter, 1993 |
BA 867 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
|
Fall, 1992 |
BA 867 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
*Legend for Georgia State University courses
BA 867: MBA core graduate course, "Information Technology Strategies for Management"
BUSA 3000: BBA core undergraduate course for International Business major,"Globalization and Business Practices"
CIS 321: Undergraduate CIS core course, "End User Applications Programming"
CIS 8660: e-Commerce curriculum course, "E-Commerce Strategies"
CIS 928 (CIS 9280): Ph.D. core course, "Quantitative Methods in IS Research"
CIS 815 (CIS 8150): MS-CIS core graduate course, "Systems Integration"
CIS 868 (CIS 8680): MS-CIS elective graduate course, "Computer Security Management"
DSC 8820: Ph.D. course, "Experimental Design"
GEM 8800: EMBA course, "e-Strategy"
IB 871: MS-CIS elective graduate course, "International IT Issues and Policy"
MBA 8473: MBA core graduate course, "Information Technology and Decision Strategies for Management"
MGS 9940: Ph.D. course, "Design of Experiments"
|
College of Business Administration, Georgia State University
Factor Analysis Report for Winter, 1993 Student Evaluations
|
Instructor: |
Straub, D. |
|
Course: |
BA 867 |
|
Comparison Group: |
Graduate Core |
|
Factor |
Composite Score on Factor |
Percentile Rank (% Below) |
|
Presentation Ability |
5.00 |
98% |
|
Organization/Clarity |
5.00 |
98% |
|
Grading/Assignments |
4.87 |
94% |
|
Intellectual/Scholarly |
5.00 |
98% |
|
Interaction with Students |
5.00 |
95% |
|
Student Motivation |
4.36 |
83% |
NOTE ON INTERPRETATION AND USE
Factor analyses performed on the College of Business Administration SEIP data and the literature on measuring effective teaching suggest that the six factors listed above are reasonable descriptors of teaching effectiveness in CBA.
For each student, the weighted average composite scores are computed for the six factors using the factor scoring coefficients for highly loaded variables as weights. The Composite Score on Factor column presents the median class composite score along a five point scale for each factor. The Percentile Rank column indicates the percentage of sections in your comparison group (undergraduate/graduate/core/ noncore) that scored lower than your section.
[N.B. These factor analyses ceased to be prepared for GSU faculty. This was one of the last times these were run.]
|
Sample Student Comments on Student Evaluations (SEIP)
- "Dr. Straub is the best professor I have had at GSU. He uses a wide variety of presentation techniques that keep the class interesting. He definitely knows his subject well. He encourages class participation."
- "Good teacher. He encourages his students to think and come up with answers during the class session."
- "Handouts are very useful. Very current in his knowledge."
- "Top quality all around. Recommend to future students."
- "Well prepared for presentation in class. Encourage[s] participation."
- "Excellent! GSU should do whatever it takes to keep this guy on staff. Very enthusiastic. Makes a fairly dull subject interesting. Very prepared and knowledgeable."
- "Really enjoyed this course."
- "I think he is very well prepared and knows the subject well. However, I think he should try to relate the lectures to the text."
- "Dr. Straub has to be in the top 1 percent of profs at GSU. He has the best lecture and knowledge of any course I have taken. He really knows how to teach well."
- "The instructor made the class interesting. I actually enjoyed coming to class."
- "The professor was extremely well organized. The lectures were very interesting. Dr. Straub is one of the best professors I've had."
- "Most organized, thorough, thoughtful, up-to-date and enthusiastic professor I've ever had."
- "A wonderful teacher! Lectures well. Very understanding of and shows interest in students. The best teacher I've had at GSU!"
|
|
|
© 2003 Detmar W. Straub. All rights reserved.
Developed by ray-zone.com
|
|
|